Skip to main content

State v. Hammer

Citations

  • 550 P.2d 820
  • 1976 Alas. LEXIS 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that unlike federal Clause, Alaska's Takings Clause mentions \damage[ ]\ as well as \tak{ing]\
  • holding that in eminent domain cases \the condemnee has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the amount of profits lost as a direct result of the state's taking; such proof must meet the requirement of reasonable certainty as indicated\
  • rejecting the non-compensability of consequential damages such as lost profits because not awarding them “fails to provide a realistic measure of what has been taken” and exaggerates concerns about speculativeness
  • holding temporary loss of profits during relocation recoverable
  • may deduct from appraiser’s fees under (k)(2) that portion not allocable to dispute with state
  • treating ongoing business, divorced from specific realty, as \property\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Rab-Inowitz, Connor, Erwin, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.