Klopping v. City of Whittier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a property owner is entitled to compensation for damages occasioned by precondemnation announcements when the condemnor acts unreasonably in issuing precondemnation statements
• holding that city did not demonstrate \unequivocal intention\ to take easement
• establishing that, when condemnor acts unreasonably in issuing precondemnation statements, constitutional concerns mandate that owner be compensated
• taking of rental income occurred where precondemnation announcements, specifically aimed at plaintiff’s property, prevented owner from using property profitably
• allowing claimant who lost property through foreclosure to pursue inverse condemnation claim
• discussing availability of damages for decline in property value caused by \condemnation cloud\ resulting after announcement of intent to condemn and recognizing a plaintiff's claim for inverse condemnation based on lost rents following a precondemnation announcement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).