In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, De Quindre, Mullett Streets and Gratiot Avenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the lower court “was not in error in refusing to allow the jury to consider loss of profits as the ‘interruption of business’ in determining compensation. Loss of profits is speculative, and not a proper element of pecuniary loss or outlay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).