State v. Hall
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2968
Syllabus
In a murder and burglary trial, the court did not abuse its discretion by granting the state's joinder motion where evidence of the crimes was simple and direct. Statements of the victim and witness were properly admitted. The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. Counsel's trial strategy was not constitutionally ineffective.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 846×
- State v. TorresOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 471×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-21· cited 286×
- State v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court· 1971-02-17· cited 89×
- State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 58×
- State v. FaulknerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-10-18· cited 36×
- State v. LavenderOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-27· cited 18×
- State v. GoodnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 14×
- State v. StuckmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.