State v. Hale

Citations

• 212 N.E.3d 32
• 2023 Ohio 980

Syllabus

CONSENT SEARCH MOTION TO SUPPRESS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's motion to suppress evidence because he freely and voluntarily consented to the taking of his blood and urine samples. However, defendant-appellant's conviction for driving under a 12-point suspension is not supported by sufficient evidence because defendant-appellant's 12-point suspension had expired by operation of law by the time of the incident. Defendant-appellant's remaining convictions are supported by sufficient evidence.