State v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• record did not show that the defendant knew that he had a right to counsel or a right to court-appointed counsel at restitution hearing
• “Where we are unable to determine what the outcome of a case would have been if the defendant had been represented by counsel instead of proceeding without counsel, the error is not harmless.”
• “Where we are unable to determine what the outcome of a case would have been if the defendant had been represented by counsel * * *, the error is not harmless.”
• “Where we are unable to determine what the outcome of a case would have been if the defendant had been represented by counsel instead of proceeding without counsel, the error is not harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Easter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-23· cited 16×
• State v. Erb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-24· cited 15×
• State v. Guerrero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-27· cited 11×
• State v. Menefee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 10×
• State v. Haines
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-25· cited 6×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 4×
• Gibson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-01-31· cited 3×
• State v. Hunt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-10· cited 1×
• State v. Donghwan Kim
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13
• Derrick Gibson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-01-31
• City of Eugene v. Hejazi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-13

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-16· cited 14×