State v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• informing the defendant of the charges against him and the maximum penalties was a circumstance that supported a finding that the defendant understood the risks of self-representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clardy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-19· cited 19×
• State v. Easter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-23· cited 16×
• State v. Haines
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-25· cited 6×
• Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-16· cited 6×
• State v. Cable
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-30· cited 5×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 4×
• State v. Nightingale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-22· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Meyrick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 136×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-21· cited 8×
• State v. Gaino
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 7×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-22· cited 7×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-01-30· cited 6×
• State v. Meyrick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-04-17· cited 5×
• State v. Forrest
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-30· cited 3×