Skip to main content

State v. Hagens

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4989

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea to one count of rape and eight counts of pandering sexually-oriented material involving a minor where his claims could have been raised on direct appeal to this court and were therefore barred by res judicata. Even if his claims were not barred by res judicata, appellant failed to establish a reasonable likelihood that a withdrawal of his plea was necessary to correct a manifest injustice.

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.