State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no evidence that a tiny cut with a few drops of blood caused pain “of a sufficient degree or duration to be ‘substantial’”
• looking to whether child’s indication of his “owies” was an indication of his pain
• no basis to infer from a “Very tiny”’ cut and a “small puncture mark” that those injuries caused substantial pain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Guzman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-27· cited 20×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-22· cited 16×
• State v. Rennells
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-21· cited 15×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-25· cited 8×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Poole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-05· cited 25×