Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/22/2014
State v. Lewis
Citations
- 266 Or. App. 523
- 337 P.3d 199
- 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, “even if a trier of fact could infer that the hair-pulling caused the victim some pain, there is no evidence in the record that the degree or duration of the pain was sufficient to constitute ‘substantial pain’” (emphasis in original)
- where alleged harm was the loss of a clump of hair, noting lack of bleeding or broken skin as demonstrating that skin’s function was not impaired
- even if factfinder could infer that hair being pulled from victim’s head caused her some pain, no evidence that degree or duration was sufficient to constitute substantial pain
- “[E]ven if a trier of fact could infer that the hair-pulling caused the victim some pain, there is no evidence in the record that the degree or duration of the pain was sufficient to constitute ‘substantial pain.’ ”
- insufficient evidence of “substantial pain” where the victim, who had her hair pulled out by the defendant, did not testify that she felt pain and there were no physical signs from which it could be inferred that she had suffered substantial pain
- “[E]ven if a trier of fact could infer that the hair-pulling caused the victim some pain, there is no evidence in the record that the degree or duration of the pain was sufficient to constitute ‘substantial pain[.]’” (Emphasis in original.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hadlock, Sercombe, Tookey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-19· cited 23×
- State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-27· cited 20×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-07· cited 14×
- State v. Soto-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-06· cited 7×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 6×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-26· cited 2×
- State v. HackettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-27· cited 2×
- State v. KarimCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-07· cited 2×
- State v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-07
- State v. LarrazabalCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-11-24
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court· 1998-10-07· cited 123×
- State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09· cited 28×
- State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-05· cited 25×
- State v. GlazierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 24×
- State v. CapwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-04· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-06-19· cited 19×
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-10· cited 17×
- State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-02· cited 15×
- State v. RennellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-21· cited 15×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-31· cited 12×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-22· cited 10×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 9×
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-23· cited 5×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.