State v. Grim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where indictment did not disclose if it was true-billed, the appropriate remedy was to remand the case to the circuit court
• holding “a circuit court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear a guilty plea unless the defendant has been indicted by a grand jury or has waived presentment”
• holding where grand jury foreman signed and dated the indictment but failed to state the action of the grand jury, the appropriate remedy was to remand the case to the circuit court for a determination of whether the grand jury true billed the indictment
• \[P]arties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-30· cited 10×
• State v. Smalls
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 8×
• Tate v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 7×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 78×
• State v. Bultron
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 40×
• State v. Beachum
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-03-31· cited 25×
• Pringle v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-01-15· cited 15×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-02-07· cited 10×
• Plante v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-18· cited 3×