Pringle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• foreman’s signature not essential to validity of indictment; “True Bill” stamp on indictment conclusive proof that grand jury voted to indict defendant where indictment in writing and published by clerk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-03· cited 45×
• State v. Bultron
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 40×
• Weathers v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-03· cited 18×
• State v. Smalls
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-05-23· cited 15×
• Grier v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-05· cited 11×
• Sosebee v. Leeke
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-09· cited 11×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-30· cited 10×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-02-07· cited 10×
• State v. Grim
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 9×
• Tate v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 7×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. BRITT
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-12-17· cited 61×
• Webb v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-04-04· cited 23×