Anderson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the law requires a presentment of a grand jury as a condition precedent to the trial of a crime, excepting certain minor offenses
• holding a conviction obtained without the presentment of a grand jury will be voided on appeal
• recognizing this state’s long-held policy regarding the secrecy surrounding grand jury proceedings
• “It is appropriate to remand to the trial court for a determination when there is not sufficient evidence for the court to determine if the indictment was true billed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-30· cited 10×
• State v. Grim
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 9×
• Tate v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 7×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bultron
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 40×
• State v. Beachum
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-03-31· cited 25×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-05· cited 24×
• State v. Ervin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-16· cited 22×
• Pringle v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-01-15· cited 15×
• State v. Whitted
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-07-19· cited 8×
• Porter v. Jedziniak
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-22· cited 7×
• Ex Parte McLeod
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-02-12· cited 6×