Skip to main content

State v. Gribble

Citations

  • 165 N.H. 1
  • 66 A.3d 1194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it was not the functional equivalent of interrogation when police officer answered defendant’s questions about his job, the death penalty, or murder charges in general
  • declining to address issue because moving party “failed to provide us with a sufficient record to determine whether it presented its . . . argument to the trial court”
  • prejudice not presumed even though all sixteen seated jurors reported knowing about the crimes prior to jury selection
  • passage of nearly a year and a half between the crimes and the defendant’s trial “diminished any presumptive impact of the publicity at the time the crime was committed”
  • potential for prejudice mitigated by juiy pool of more than 400,000 residents
  • “In contrast to the cold transcript received by the appellate court, the in-the-moment voir dire affords the trial court a more intimate and immediate basis for assessing a venire member’s fitness for jury service.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bassett, Conboy, Dalianis, Hicks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.