Skip to main content
· 4/10/2006

Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.

Citations

  • 628 S.E.2d 902
  • 368 S.C. 342
  • 2006 S.C. App. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to be preserved for appellate review, an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the master
  • dismissing an appeal from the denial of summary judgment but recognizing an appellate court \may entertain appeals from interlocutory orders not ordinarily appealable when they are companion to reviewable issues\
  • “Restrictive covenants that require grantees to pay assessments for the upkeep of a particular parcel of property are held to be real covenants which „touch and concern‟ land, and therefore, run with the land.”
  • explaining detrimental reliance is merely an element of estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kittredge, Stilwell, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.