· 5/10/2006
United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345
Citations
- 446 F.3d 458
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11622
- 2006 WL 1236824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the internet is “both an instrumentality and channel of interstate commerce” (quotation omitted)
- concluding that instant messages arranging a meeting and appearing at the prearranged meeting place each provided sufficient evidence of a substantial step toward per- suading or inducing a minor
- explaining that indictment may charge more means of committing crime than necessary for conviction and sufficient evidence as to any one method conjunctively charged may establish guilt
- noting that ʺ[t]he actual age of the intended victim is not an element of the offense; criminal liability turns simply on the purpose for which the defendant traveledʺ (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
- alleging, in § 2422(b) case, that planned conduct could have been charged as statutory rape under the laws of New Jersey and Pennsylvania
- alleging, in § 2422(b) case, that planned conduct could have been charged as statutory rape under the laws of New Jersey and Pennsylvania
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rendell, Smith, Aldisert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.