Skip to main content
· 5/10/2006

United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345

Citations

  • 446 F.3d 458
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11622
  • 2006 WL 1236824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the internet is “both an instrumentality and channel of interstate commerce” (quotation omitted)
  • concluding that instant messages arranging a meeting and appearing at the prearranged meeting place each provided sufficient evidence of a substantial step toward per- suading or inducing a minor
  • explaining that indictment may charge more means of committing crime than necessary for conviction and sufficient evidence as to any one method conjunctively charged may establish guilt
  • noting that ʺ[t]he actual age of the intended victim is not an element of the offense; criminal liability turns simply on the purpose for which the defendant traveledʺ (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
  • alleging, in § 2422(b) case, that planned conduct could have been charged as statutory rape under the laws of New Jersey and Pennsylvania
  • alleging, in § 2422(b) case, that planned conduct could have been charged as statutory rape under the laws of New Jersey and Pennsylvania

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendell, Smith, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.