Fifth Circuit· 5/14/2001
United States v. Farner
Citations
- 251 F.3d 510
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 9226
- 2001 WL 514426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The substantial step must be conduct which strongly corroborates the firmness of defendant’s criminal attempt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Garza, Kazen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BroussardFifth Circuit· 2012-02-01· cited 384×
- People v. DeDonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-11-14· cited 309×
- United States v. Jeffrey MeekNinth Circuit· 2004-04-19· cited 207×
- United States v. Anthony F. MurrellEleventh Circuit· 2004-05-04· cited 199×
- United States v. BrandSecond Circuit· 2006-10-19· cited 183×
- United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Third Circuit· 2006-05-10· cited 174×
- United States v. GagliardiSecond Circuit· 2007-10-22· cited 153×
- United States v. John Allen RootEleventh Circuit· 2002-07-10· cited 123×
- United States v. KellyFourth Circuit· 2007-12-12· cited 123×
- United States v. SimsTenth Circuit· 2005-11-09· cited 111×
- United States v. Jeffrey HowardFifth Circuit· 2014-09-09· cited 81×
- State v. SorabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-02-07· cited 79×
- United States v. PartidaFifth Circuit· 2004-09-10· cited 77×
- United States v. DwinellsFirst Circuit· 2007-11-20· cited 77×
- United States v. ThomasTenth Circuit· 2005-06-14· cited 73×
- United States v. BarlowFifth Circuit· 2009-05-07· cited 71×
- United States v. Paul HiteD.C. Circuit· 2014-10-21· cited 70×
- United States v. Starsky Darnell ReddFifth Circuit· 2003-12-30· cited 67×
- United States v. HubbardFifth Circuit· 2007-02-23· cited 65×
- United States v. Martinez-MaldonadoFirst Circuit· 2013-06-26· cited 59×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 418×
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InThird Circuit· 1973-06-27· cited 294×
- United States v. Roy MandujanoFifth Circuit· 1974-09-17· cited 199×
- United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1976-01-12· cited 146×
- United States v. Kai-Lo Hsu, A/K/A James Hsu. United States of America v. Chester S. Ho. United States of AmericaThird Circuit· 1998-08-26· cited 84×
- United States v. Everett, GeorgeThird Circuit· 1983-02-15· cited 82×
- United States v. Juan Antonio ContrerasFifth Circuit· 1991-12-23· cited 74×
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. Cotton Bros. Baking Co.Supreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 66×
- United States v. Castaneda-CantuFifth Circuit· 1994-05-04· cited 51×
- In Re SEALED CASED.C. Circuit· 2000-07-14· cited 49×
- United States v. Oscar McInnis and Patricia ParadaFifth Circuit· 1979-09-10· cited 46×
- United States v. Abel v. QuijadaNinth Circuit· 1979-01-04· cited 43×
- United States v. Francisco Martin DuranD.C. Circuit· 1996-10-08· cited 34×
- United States v. Thomas Arthur DarnellEighth Circuit· 1976-11-05· cited 19×
- United States v. PowellN.D. Alabama· 1998-01-12· cited 13×
- United States v. DuranDistrict of Columbia· 1995-05-25· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.