Skip to main content

State v. Gray

Citations

  • 206 N.E.3d 842
  • 2023 Ohio 215

Syllabus

Hearsay testimony confrontation clause alibi testimony Batson challenge. The trial court did not err or violate the appellant's right to confrontation in the admission of testimony to explain the conduct of a police officer's investigation of a crime. The trial court did not err in excluding testimony that was deemed irrelevant to the case because it was not being used as alibi testimony. The trial court did not err in determining that the state's rationale for using a peremptory challenge on an African-American juror was race-neutral after the appellant's Batson challenge.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.