State v. O'Hara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an assertion that the trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury that the state was required to prove that the defendant knowingly subjected the victim to forcible compulsion necessarily challenged the propriety of the instructions given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gray
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-20· cited 37×
• State v. Ledford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 5×
• O'Hara v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-18· cited 2×
• State v. Beckner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-29· cited 2×
• State v. Lockhart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-13

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Marshall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-04-14· cited 41×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-30· cited 20×
• State v. Spring
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-21· cited 13×
• State v. Lockamy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 8×
• State v. Alonzo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 7×