Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/27/2007
State v. Toth
Citations
- 162 P.3d 317
- 213 Or. App. 505
- 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 885
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that ORCP 59 H generally bars review of unpreserved objections regarding jury instructions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-20· cited 37×
- State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-06· cited 11×
- State v. GuardipeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24· cited 10×
- State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 7×
- State v. VanornumCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-27· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.