New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 10/15/1984

State v. Grant

Citations

483 A.2d 411
196 N.J. Super. 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing the anomaly of requiring the State to prove a second drunk driving conviction beyond a reasonable doubt in the context of a refusal hearing, where the “preponderance of the evidence” standard was applicable
affirming a similar enhanced penalty, without considering the precise issue raised on this appeal
“[W]e are dealing with law enforcement efforts designed to curb one of the chief instrumentalities of human catastrophe, the drunk driver.”
a conclusion that our reading of the statute does not support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Petrella and Baime

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.