State v. MacUk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that taking of blood is not covered by Fifth Amendment
• holding that taking of blood is not covered by Fifth Amendment
• observing that “motor vehicle violations are not ‘crimes’ in this state, but only petty offenses” (citation omitted)
• “the provision was ... made necessary because affirmative cooperation is required of the person being examined to ‘blow up the balloon,’ whereas this is not so in the case of a test by use of a blood sample.”
• a motor vehicle offense “is not considered a ‘criminal prosecution’ ”
• Miranda warnings not required before breathalyzer test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).