Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/30/1980

State v. Dixon

Citations

617 P.2d 779
126 Ariz. 613
1980 Ariz. App. LEXIS 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the unlimited right to withdraw a waiver of the right to counsel does not entitle a defendant to a continuance through an eleventh-hour request for counsel
where direct conflict of testimony between undercover agent and defendant was of paramount importance, jury should have before it all information which might have reflected untruthfulness of defendant, including prior convictions qualifying under Rule 609

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Richmond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.