State v. Demaray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that medical records containing the results of Demaray's blood test were covered by the physician/patient privilege
• “[T]he statutory implied consent procedure must be followed, but only when the implied consent procedures are invoked.”
• “We now 9 reiterate that the implied consent law is not the exclusive means by which the State may obtain blood test evidence from a defendant in an OWI proceeding.”
• “We now 9 reiterate that the implied consent law is not the exclusive means by which the State may obtain blood test evidence from a defendant in an OWI proceeding.”
• “When [the patient] consented to the hospital’s release of his medical records to [a deputy], he destroyed the confidentiality between him and his doctor by allowing the information to be communicated to a third party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).