New Mexico Supreme Court· 9/24/1991
Mathis v. State
Citations
- 819 P.2d 1302
- 112 N.M. 744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that dismissal for discovery violations was an extreme remedy, but warranted under the facts of the case
- holding that failing to make a specific objection to the propriety of the ordered discovery at the time of its issue results in abandonment of the issue on appeal
- holding that failing to make a specific objection to the propriety of the ordered discovery at the time of its issue results in abandonment of the issue on appeal
- recognizing that the “right of cross-examination is a part of the constitutional right to be confronted with the witnesses against one” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- finding there to be a “substantial basis for supposing” that certain unavailable evidence “might undercut the prosecutor’s case,” thereby prejudicing the defense, and holding as a consequence that dismissal was appropriate
- \[I]f the court has previously ordered it disclosed further objection to its disclosure is moot and it must be produced\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feanchini, Sosa, Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HarperNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-11-22· cited 116×
- State v. Le MierNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2017-04-27· cited 79×
- In Re Jade G.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-08-13· cited 34×
- State v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-07-30· cited 31×
- State v. LayneNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-06-26· cited 31×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-01-17· cited 27×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-05-14· cited 24×
- State v. DiPreteSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1998-05-01· cited 23×
- State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 16×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-01-16· cited 15×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-16· cited 13×
- State v. ReddNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-05-29· cited 10×
- State v. MaxwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-07-05· cited 9×
- State v. HarperNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-04-16· cited 7×
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-09-22· cited 7×
- State v. WareNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-06-29· cited 3×
- State v. ArellanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-05-01· cited 3×
- State v. GrahamNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-04-13· cited 2×
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-03-11· cited 2×
- State v. ReddNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-08-26· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-05-04· cited 143×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-08-21· cited 125×
- United States v. Robert ButlerNinth Circuit· 1978-04-07· cited 81×
- State v. GilletteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-04-11· cited 60×
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-04-13· cited 60×
- Tomlinson v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 43×
- State v. BartlettNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-03-06· cited 40×
- Southern Union Exploration Co. v. Wynn Exploration Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-01-13· cited 38×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-10-09· cited 35×
- State v. Contempts of WisniewskiNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-09-03· cited 32×
- State v. BrionezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-10-25· cited 18×
- State v. BaldizanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-21· cited 13×
- State v. SparksNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-07-18· cited 12×
- State v. TomlinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-02-02· cited 12×
- State v. MathisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-03-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.