State v. Gomes
Citations
- 337 Conn. 826
Syllabus
Convicted of the crime of assault in the second degree, the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, claiming that the trial court had deprived him of his right to present a defense of investigative inadequacy by omitting from its jury instructions certain language in his written request to charge stating that the jury could consider evidence of the police investigation as it might relate to any weaknesses in the state's case. At trial, the defendant contended that the victim had either mistak- enly or intentionally misidentified him as the person who assaulted her and that, if the police had conducted even a minimally adequate investigation of the incident, they would have discovered this to be the case. In support of his contention, the defendant adduced testimony from a number of witness regarding the inadequacy of the police investi- gation. The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court's judgment, conclud- ing that the investigative inadequacy instruction that the trial court had given did not mislead the jury or otherwise deprive the defendant of his right to present an investigative inadequacy defense. In reaching its conclusion, the Appellate Court noted that the trial court's instruction was identical to the model jury instruction provided on the Judicial Branch website and consistent with investigative inadequacy instruc- tions approved by this court in State v. Collins (299 Conn. 567) and State v. Williams (169 Conn. 322). The Appellate Court also rejected the defendant's contention that, in light of recent developments in the law, as indicated in this court's recent decision in State v. Wright (322 Conn. 270), the model instruction no longer reflected the correct state- ment of the law. On the granting of certification, the defendant appealed to this court, renewing his claim in the Appellate Court challenging the propriety of the trial court's investigative inadequacy instruction. While this appeal was pending, the defendant was deported, and the recor
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Ecker; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-06-14· cited 22×
- State v. Adam P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-02-11· cited 11×
- Grant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-04-12· cited 6×
- In re Annessa J.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-06-20· cited 6×
- State v. InzitariSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-01-21· cited 6×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-16· cited 5×
- State v. VillanuevaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-15· cited 3×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-22· cited 3×
- State v. GuildSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-08-19· cited 1×
- United Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Regulatory AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-10-29
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 3,515×
- Commonwealth v. BowdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-01-09· cited 300×
- In Re: Robert B. SurrickThird Circuit· 2003-08-01· cited 158×
- Commonwealth v. Silva-SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-05-15· cited 137×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-08-05· cited 123×
- Foretich, Doris v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2003-12-16· cited 122×
- Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.Fifth Circuit· 1998-05-12· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. AvilaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-09-15· cited 89×
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-06· cited 84×
- Putman v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-07-18· cited 73×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 62×
- United States v. Lloyd ProbberSecond Circuit· 1999-03-17· cited 61×
- Santos Perez v. Charles Greiner, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 2002-07-19· cited 57×
- Ayala v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-20· cited 57×
- United States v. HamdiSecond Circuit· 2005-12-12· cited 51×
- Stabb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-22· cited 50×
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-11-16· cited 49×
- Williams v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-06· cited 41×
- State v. AvilesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-02-21· cited 39×
- State v. AquinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-08· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.