Fifth Circuit· 5/12/1998
Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.
Citations
- 141 F.3d 224
- 1998 WL 236589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that attorney’s appeal from an order disbarring her until she paid sanctions was not moot even after she paid the sanctions because a record of disbarment would be “detrimental- to an attorney’s professional reputation, well-being, and success”
- finding that the quasi-criminal nature of disciplinary proceedings demanded notice and opportunity to be heard
- stating that a case will become moot if no effective relief is available to remedy the effect of the violation
- noting that the Fifth Circuit has recognized that “Loudermill clearly established that post-termination proceedings can satisfy due process requirements only when coupled with adequate pretermination process in public employment termination cases”
- noting that the possibility of adverse collateral consequences is sufficient to preclude mootness
- reversing and vacating attorney disbarment because the district court failed to provide adequate notice and opportunity to be heard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dennis, Jolly, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Environmental Conservation Organization v. City of DallasFifth Circuit· 2008-05-27· cited 205×
- In Re: Robert B. SurrickThird Circuit· 2003-08-01· cited 158×
- Johnson v. PettifordFifth Circuit· 2006-03-14· cited 155×
- Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraFifth Circuit· 2003-06-18· cited 140×
- Crowe v. SmithFifth Circuit· 1998-08-12· cited 108×
- In Re: Bellsouth Corporation, in Re: Terry Price and Lehr, Middlebrooks, Price & Proctor, P.C.Eleventh Circuit· 2003-06-17· cited 102×
- Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutTenth Circuit· 2009-04-17· cited 86×
- Natalie Plummer v. University of Houston, eFifth Circuit· 2017-06-23· cited 58×
- John Dierlam v. Donald Trump, PresidentFifth Circuit· 2020-10-15· cited 53×
- John Doe v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2017-04-11· cited 39×
- Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In Re Nakhuda)Ninth Circuit· 2016-02-04· cited 36×
- Heal v. HealSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-12-01· cited 24×
- State v. GomesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-01-26· cited 23×
- In Re MoncierE.D. Tennessee· 2008-04-29· cited 19×
- In Re Michael HANCOCK, Debtor. Appeal of Charles D. TaylorSeventh Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 18×
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. v. Hobet Mining, LLCS.D. West Virginia· 2010-07-12· cited 18×
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2005-11-08· cited 14×
- United States v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1999-08-24· cited 11×
- Graham v. San Antonio Zoological SocietyW.D. Texas· 2017-06-08· cited 9×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BartekFifth Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 9×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 2,323×
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-04-30· cited 2,306×
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,936×
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court· 1971-12-14· cited 1,338×
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 994×
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court· 1867-01-14· cited 795×
- Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 757×
- McKinney v. PateEleventh Circuit· 1994-05-05· cited 722×
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 507×
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 358×
- Calderon v. MooreSupreme Court· 1996-06-17· cited 332×
- In Re David L. SmithTenth Circuit· 1993-11-29· cited 310×
- Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court· 1864-01-11· cited 283×
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court· 1873-10-01· cited 140×
- Thomas L. Glenn v. J. Gardner Newman, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1980-03-24· cited 131×
Other cases named Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.