Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 7/31/1979
State v. Gleason
Citations
- 404 A.2d 573
- 1979 Me. LEXIS 706
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding new juvenile code retained beneficent and rehabilitative purposes of prior code
- revisions to juvenile code retained informality, flexibility of dis-positional alternatives, and criteria for selection of proper disposition which distinguish juvenile system from adult system
- no violation of state constitution’s due process clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Pomer-Oy, Wernick, Archibald, Dela-Hanty, Godfrey, Nichols
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 785×
- Israel Ex Rel. Israel v. West Virginia Secondary Schools Activities CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-12-20· cited 178×
- Morris v. D'AMARIOSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1980-06-26· cited 76×
- State Ex Rel. M.C.H. v. KinderWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-05-09· cited 56×
- In re L.M.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-20· cited 52×
- State v. AntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-07-14· cited 41×
- State v. FreemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-02-12· cited 34×
- Ten Voters of Biddeford v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-04-25· cited 31×
- People in Interest of TMSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-09-14· cited 27×
- Wood v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-03-14· cited 27×
- West Virginia Education Ass'n v. Consolidated Public Retirement BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-07-13· cited 27×
- N.E. v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-01-31· cited 26×
- Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-11-18· cited 25×
- State v. Ann Marie C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-10-29· cited 25×
- Campaign for Sensible Transportation v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-05-08· cited 25×
- Sordyl v. SordylSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-04-29· cited 24×
- Graffam v. WraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-12-02· cited 24×
- In Re FaucherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-05-26· cited 24×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. State Water Control Board v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-03-19· cited 23×
- Wells v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-04-09· cited 23×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1940-02-26· cited 1,204×
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court· 1975-05-27· cited 1,196×
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 1,157×
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 657×
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-07-09· cited 119×
- Richard B. Carter v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1962-05-31· cited 118×
- In RE ESTES v. HoppWashington Supreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 66×
- Terry AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-05-04· cited 66×
- David S. Kotz v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1965-11-22· cited 63×
- People ex rel. Wayburn v. SchupfNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-05-13· cited 59×
- Enoch Creek, Jr. v. William J. StoneD.C. Circuit· 1967-05-01· cited 58×
- Matter of D.(daniel)New York Court of Appeals· 1970-07-02· cited 58×
- Augustus E. Harvin v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1971-05-07· cited 53×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.