State Ex Rel. M.C.H. v. Kinder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A case not rendered moot if the issues \are capable of repetition and yet will evade review.\
• “This Court has addressed issues that are likely to arise in the future on a continuing basis that are of special importance to the public and to the bar even when a settlement has been reached.”
• “This Court has addressed issues that are likely to arise in the future on a continuing basis that are of special importance to the public and to the bar even when a settlement has been reached.”
• “A case is not rendered moot even though a party to the litigation has had a change in status such that he no longer has a legally cognizable interest in the litigation or the issues have lost their adversarial vitality, if such issues are capable of repetition and yet will evade review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).