Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/21/2000
State v. Gilchrist
Citations
- 536 S.E.2d 868
- 342 S.C. 369
- 2000 S.C. LEXIS 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The Confrontation Clause guarantees an accused the right 'to be confronted with the witnesses against him.'\ (quoting U.S. Const. amend. VI)
- no reversible error where improperly admitted evidence is merely cumulative
- no reversible error where improperly admitted evidence is merely cumulative
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-05-29· cited 32×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-02· cited 12×
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-15· cited 9×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-05-17· cited 8×
- Gilchrist v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-25· cited 7×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-02-02· cited 3×
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-17· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. AsiborFifth Circuit· 1997-03-27· cited 185×
- United States v. Axel UrbanikFourth Circuit· 1986-09-23· cited 143×
- United States v. Arias-VillanuevaNinth Circuit· 1993-07-20· cited 136×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 101×
- United States v. Roger Allen Clark (93-5596) Jeffrey Mullins (93-5597)Sixth Circuit· 1994-03-14· cited 84×
- United States v. David v. Smith, United States of America v. Matthew KoalkinNinth Circuit· 1990-01-19· cited 83×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-08· cited 65×
- State v. AndersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-07-20· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.