State v. Anders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statement by a co-conspirator must advance the conspiracy to be admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E)
• admission to crime does not qualify as statement in furtherance of conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sheppard v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 84×
• State v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 20×
• State v. Gilchrist
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-21· cited 11×
• State v. Sims
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-05-17· cited 8×
• Morris v. TIDEWATER LAND & TIMBER, INC.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-30· cited 3×
• State v. Sims
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-17· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 101×
• United States v. Henry Pallais and William C. Kelly, III
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-03-04· cited 52×
• United States v. Victor Posner
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-07-12· cited 41×
• Aubin v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1991-10-07· cited 33×
• UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry HAY, Defendant-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-08-19· cited 25×
• State v. Doctor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-06· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Sopota
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-08· cited 22×
• State v. McKnight
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 3×
• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-09· cited 3×
• State v. Anders
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-03-03· cited 2×