Arizona Supreme Court· 5/1/2002

State v. Gibson

Citations

44 P.3d 1001
202 Ariz. 321
372 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
2002 Ariz. LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

remanding for redetermination of whether evidence of third parties’ nervousness and “severe mental health problems shortly after the murder” admissible under Rules 401, 402, and 403
remanding for redetermination of whether evidence of third parties‟ nervousness and “severe mental health problems shortly after the murder” admissible under Rules 401, 402, and 403
“Because [Rule 403 entails] a weighing of factors that cannot easily be quantified, substantial discretion is accorded the trial judge.”
“[T]he multiplicity of minor issues will be such that the jury will lose sight of the main issue, and the whole evidence will be only a mass of confused data from which it will be difficult to extract the kernel of controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Jones, McGregor, Feldman, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.