Shotwell v. Donahoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that trial court excluded evidence under Rule 403 “solely on the ground that the [evidence] was ‘conclusory,’ ” yet “[a] document is not necessarily inadmissible ... simply because it contains conclusions or is conclusory”
• noting that satisfying hearsay rule does not necessarily satisfy Rule 403
• noting that satisfying hearsay rule does not necessarily satisfy Rule 403
• remanding for new Rule 403 determination because basis of original ruling was legally insufficient
• remanding for new Rule 403 determination because basis of original ruling was legally insufficient
• surveying cases and holding that state procedural rules apply to determine whether EEOC reasonable cause determinations are admissible in state court and refusing to adopt a per se rule of admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-01-10· cited 50×
• State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2022-01-19· cited 43×
• Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-12-13· cited 27×
• Baker v. Rolnick
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-05-03· cited 16×
• Girouard v. Skyline Steel, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-05-24· cited 15×
• State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2024-09-03· cited 9×
• County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-05-01· cited 6×
• Byrd v. BT FOODS, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-02· cited 5×
• Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Miller Park, L.L.C.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 4×
• Arizona ex rel. Goddard v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
  D. Arizona· 2011-03-07· cited 3×
• SALT RIVER PROJ. AGRIC. IMP. AND POWER DIST. v. Miller Park, LLC
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 2×

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Felder v. Casey
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 1,126×
• State v. Bass
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-11-09· cited 586×
• Walton v. Eaton Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1977-07-18· cited 365×
• Eastin v. Broomfield
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-09-27· cited 186×
• State v. Mott
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 160×
• Smith v. Universal Services., Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1972-03-08· cited 156×
• Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-07· cited 147×
• Tiffany Cortes v. Maxus Exploration Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-11-18· cited 108×
• Jeanette J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-12-03· cited 105×
• William Ray JOHNSON, Appellant, v. YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-06-28· cited 103×
• Logerquist v. McVey
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-04-19· cited 78×
• Nancy A. GILLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 1973-05-11· cited 72×
• 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1119, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7904 James Heard v. The Mueller Company, and United Steelworkers of America, Aflcio, Intervening
  Sixth Circuit· 1972-07-14· cited 71×
• William B. Smith v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  First Circuit· 1989-06-27· cited 67×
• Cox v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
  Fourth Circuit· 1972-12-29· cited 64×
• Tommy Williams v. The Nashville Network and Gaylord Entertainment Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-01-22· cited 63×
• Larsen v. Decker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-22· cited 63×
• Ijya Tulloss v. Near North Montessori School, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-10-29· cited 55×
• Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-29· cited 50×
• State v. Gibson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-05-01· cited 45×