Shotwell v. Donahoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that trial court excluded evidence under Rule 403 “solely on the ground that the [evidence] was ‘conclusory,’ ” yet “[a] document is not necessarily inadmissible ... simply because it contains conclusions or is conclusory”
• noting that satisfying hearsay rule does not necessarily satisfy Rule 403
• noting that satisfying hearsay rule does not necessarily satisfy Rule 403
• remanding for new Rule 403 determination because basis of original ruling was legally insufficient
• remanding for new Rule 403 determination because basis of original ruling was legally insufficient
• surveying cases and holding that state procedural rules apply to determine whether EEOC reasonable cause determinations are admissible in state court and refusing to adopt a per se rule of admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).