Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/26/2003
State v. Gerard
Citations
- 188 Or. App. 414
- 72 P.3d 88
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an issue is adequately preserved “if the substance of the evidence * * * was apparent from the context within which questions were asked” (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Brewer, Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
- State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 78×
- State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 77×
- State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 35×
- State v. McNeelyOregon Supreme Court· 2000-08-03· cited 30×
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-06· cited 27×
- State v. Sanchez-CruzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
- State v. IronsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 15×
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-16· cited 15×
- State v. BedenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-08-04· cited 12×
- State v. WonderlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-10-24· cited 5×
- State v. LukeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.