State v. Cunningham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• psychologist observed that victim seemed intimidated by defendant and did not want to be left alone with him and that defendant was “aggressive” and “bombastic”
• addressing application of Charboneau standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-21· cited 56×
• State v. Maiden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 45×
• State v. Brumbach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-10· cited 20×
• State v. Blaylock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-10· cited 18×
• State v. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-16· cited 15×
• State v. Harding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 11×
• State v. Ryel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-10· cited 9×
• State v. Naudain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-12· cited 9×
• State v. Eckert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-28· cited 8×
• State v. Starr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-11· cited 8×
• State v. Goff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-09· cited 7×
• State v. Lytsell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-04-03· cited 6×
• State v. Prieto-Rubio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02· cited 6×
• State v. Espinosa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-10· cited 3×
• State v. Lytsell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-02· cited 3×
• State v. Strasser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-15· cited 3×
• State v. Gerard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-26· cited 2×