State v. Wonderling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inconsistencies in victim’s report regarding prior sexual assault did not amount to recantation or demonstrably false accusation
• “An offer of proof is adequate if we are able to determine whether it was reversible error to exclude proffered evidence.”
• “Defendant revealed to the trial court the content of his proposed cross-examination of the victim and the other evidence that he would introduce. That information constitutes an adequate offer of proof under Affeld.”
• “ ‘Recantation’ means the unequivocal public withdrawal of an allegation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).