United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a “presumption of regularity” that undergirds the official acts of public officers, causing courts to presume that they have properly discharged their official duties
• noting that the “pre- sumption of regularity supports the official acts of public officers, and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts pre- sume that they have properly discharged their official duties.”
• presuming public officials properly discharge their duties in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary
• “[I]n the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that [public officers] have properly discharged their official duties”
• presumption is that public officials discharged their official duties properly, absent clear evidence to the contrary
• presumption is that public officials discharged their official duties properly, absent clear evidence to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).