State v. Gallegos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \a juror who does not possess a working knowledge of English would be unable to serve because he cannot possibly understand the issues or evaluate the evidence to arrive at an independent judgment as to the guilt or innocence of the accused\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cook v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-04-06· cited 62×
• State v. Gilbert
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-10-17· cited 43×
• State v. Escamilla
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-09-22· cited 35×
• State v. Segotta
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-05· cited 32×
• State v. Garza
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-11-20· cited 28×
• State v. Sacoman
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-09-27· cited 25×
• State v. Carlson
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2003-05-13· cited 24×
• State v. Pierce
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 22×
• State v. Doe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-01-20· cited 10×
• Mason v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-04-17· cited 9×
• People v. Rodriquez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1981-08-13· cited 8×
• State v. Pacheco
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-11-08
• People v. Orozco
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-05-09

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McFall
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-08-04· cited 48×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-05-07· cited 20×
• State v. De Baca
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-09-30· cited 18×
• Morris v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1971-02-08· cited 5×