State v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• offer of proof insufficient to overcome cumulative aspects of surrebuttal testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Case
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-13· cited 64×
• Alfieri v. Alfieri
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-01-06· cited 23×
• State v. Richards
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-12-27· cited 16×
• People v. Brockman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-05-20· cited 12×
• State v. Doe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-06-25· cited 11×
• Duran v. Xerox Corp.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-12-02· cited 9×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pointer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
• State v. Gutierrez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1967-10-27· cited 64×
• State v. Herrera
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-04-25· cited 62×
• State v. Maes
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-17· cited 55×
• State v. McFall
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-08-04· cited 48×
• State v. Bazan
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-03-17· cited 43×
• State v. Kincheloe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-10-30· cited 34×
• State v. Gallegos
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-10-21· cited 21×
• State v. Sanchez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-12-06· cited 19×
• State v. Sandoval
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-23· cited 19×
• De La O v. Bimbo's Restaurant, Inc.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-11-23· cited 18×
• State v. Marquez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-09-29· cited 18×
• Glass v. Stratoflex, Inc.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-07-25· cited 17×
• New Mexico Feeding Co., Inc. v. Keck
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-03-16· cited 16×
• State v. Barela
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-03-21· cited 14×
• State v. Evans
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-02-01· cited 9×
• State v. Young
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-08-29· cited 2×