Skip to main content

State v. Good

Citations

  • 432 S.E.2d 463
  • 315 S.C. 135
  • 1993 S.C. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidence of prior conviction for burglary of similar items from the same residence against the same victim as the robbery and murder for which defendant was charged was admissible
  • holding there was no error in refusing to charge accessory after the fact because “there is no exclusionary situation which eliminates one [defendant] or the other from having participated in the murder as a principal.”
  • noting accessory after the fact is not a lesser-included offense of any of the offenses with which the defendant was charged, including murder, armed robbery, grand larceny of a motor vehicle, and criminal conspiracy
  • evidence that defendant robbed grandmother’s home four months earlier and the theft of items belonging to her were admissible to establish identity of her killer
  • a defendant was not entitled to an instruction on accessory before the fact where the defendant blamed his twin brother for murdering their father and grandmother inside a camper while the defendant was outside the camper performing a domestic chore

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Harwell, Chandler, Moore, McKellar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.