Idaho Court of Appeals· 6/13/2002
State v. Maddox
Citations
- 54 P.3d 464
- 137 Idaho 821
- 2002 Ida. App. LEXIS 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A detention is constitutionally permissible if it is reasonably conducted in furtherance of the government agent’s community caretaking function.”
- “A detention is constitutionally permissible if it is reasonably conducted in furtherance of the government agent’s community caretaking function.”
- police may stop vehicle traveling off road on motorcycle trail under community caretaldng function depending upon the circumstances; must be present need for assistance or other public interest to justify stop
- police may stop vehicle traveling off-road on motorcycle trail under community caretaking function depending on the circumstances; there must be a present need for assistance or other public interest to justify a stop
- detention of motorist driving off-road not justified under public safety doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Gutierrez, Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-08-25· cited 40×
- State v. Van DorneIdaho Court of Appeals· 2004-03-16· cited 31×
- State v. Jose Perez-JungoIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20· cited 24×
- State v. BarrettIdaho Court of Appeals· 2003-01-07· cited 18×
- State v. CutlerIdaho Court of Appeals· 2006-07-14· cited 13×
- State v. RamosIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-09-29· cited 13×
- State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-05-20· cited 7×
- State v. Van ZantenIdaho Supreme Court· 2024-04-01· cited 4×
- State v. JayIdaho Court of Appeals· 2020-09-08· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. Livingstone v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-27
- State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-01-30
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- State v. FryIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-10-08· cited 79×
- State v. RawlingsIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-03-20· cited 62×
- Matter of ClaytonIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-01-07· cited 60×
- State v. OsborneIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-12-03· cited 34×
- State v. SchmidtIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-05-14· cited 32×
- State v. WixomIdaho Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 28×
- State v. MirelesIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-12-15· cited 24×
- State v. EvansIdaho Court of Appeals· 2000-07-14· cited 21×
- State v. WaldieIdaho Court of Appeals· 1995-03-10· cited 17×
- State v. SchumacherIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-09-28· cited 12×
- State v. HollerIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-07-26· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.