State v. Frericks

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 5374

Syllabus

Right to Counsel; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Consecutive Sentence; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Defendant-appellant's right to counsel was not violated because the hearing at issue was not a critical stage of the criminal proceedings. Defendant-appellant failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court's decision to run the sentences for each conviction consecutively was not contrary to law.