Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/27/2019
State v. Priest
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4901
Syllabus
Trial court made appropriate findings before imposing consecutive sentences and properly considered R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. Appellant's sentences are not otherwise clearly and convincingly contrary to law or unsupported by the record.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-02· cited 1,234×
- State v. BrimacombeOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 96×
- State v. ConnorsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-27· cited 29×
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-15· cited 14×
- State v. ChaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-19· cited 8×
- State v. BraswellOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-10· cited 8×
- State v. NiermanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 5×
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-19· cited 2×
- State v. BurnetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.