Skip to main content

State v. Raymond

Citations

  • 538 A.2d 164
  • 148 Vt. 617
  • 1987 Vt. LEXIS 581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining evidence which is logically probative may be irrelevant because relates to matter too remote
  • explaining that relevant evidence has some probative value
  • explaining that relevant evidence has some probative value
  • declining to apply state constitutional analysis where party had not provided “any rationale as to how [the Court’s] analysis of this constitutional claim should differ under the Vermont Constitution in comparison with the federal constitution”
  • no confrontation clause violation in restriction of cross-examination of witness as to criminal charges against her in light of alternative opportunities to show such charges
  • defendant must have opportunity to expose facts to the jury from which it can draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.