Skip to main content

State v. Cole

Citations

  • 554 A.2d 253
  • 150 Vt. 453
  • 1988 Vt. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that act of grabbing flashlight from officer could be found to be threatening behavior done to communicate intent to harm because flashlight could be used as weapon
  • holding that failure to give self-defense instruction was not plain error
  • observing that “the word ‘threaten’ includes some element of volition” and that threatening behavior “communicates the requisite intent”
  • providing that in criminal context, “[i]ntent is rarely proved by direct evidence; it must be inferred from a person’s act and proved by circumstantial evidence
  • noting that defendant’s “act of grabbing the flashlight could be found to be threatening behavior, done to communicate the intent to harm”
  • describing \[t]hreatening behavior\ as \behavior that communicates the requisite intent\ to \inflict harm on person or property\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Peck, Dooley, Barney, Keyser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.