State v. Freitag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an argument that prostitution was protected by a “fundamental constitutional right to engage in adult consensual sexual conduct” as recognized in Lawrence
• striking, as unconstitutional, municipality's \assessment of a fee\ on defendant as a condition \to pursue his criminal appeal\
• rejecting an argument that prostitution was protected by a “fundamental constitutional right to engage in adult consensual sexual conduct” as recognized in Lawrence
• prostitution ordinance did not affect fundamental liberty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Iowa v. Patrick Edouard
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2014-07-18· cited 80×
• State v. Russo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-04-10· cited 22×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-01-22· cited 4×
• Amended December 3, 2014 State of Iowa v. Patrick Edouard
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2014-07-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Washington v. Glucksberg
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 2,664×
• Lawrence v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
• Standhardt v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-10-08· cited 60×
• State of Arizona v. Green
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1942-11-30· cited 17×
• State v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2005-01-19· cited 10×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-11-06· cited 9×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-05-26· cited 8×
• State v. Mutschler
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-01· cited 7×