State v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he majority opinion in Lawrence specifically states the court’s decision does not disturb state statutes prohibiting public sexual conduct or prostitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2006-07-11· cited 31×
• Singson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-11-08· cited 25×
• State v. Rideout
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2007-10-31· cited 14×
• State v. Beaudette
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2012-07-13· cited 7×
• State v. Freitag
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-02· cited 6×
• Flowers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-09-21· cited 5×
• Louisiana Electorate of Gays & Lesbians, Inc. v. Connick
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2005-04-26· cited 1×
• LOUISIANA ELECTORATE OF GAYS v. Connick
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2005-04-26

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lawrence v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
• Bowers v. Hardwick
  Supreme Court· 1986-09-11· cited 953×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-07-06· cited 535×
• State v. Baxley
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1995-05-22· cited 145×
• State v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-10-20· cited 109×
• State v. Neal
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-01-12· cited 25×
• State v. Baxley
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1994-02-28· cited 24×
• State v. Brenan
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-05-16· cited 23×