Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/6/1990
State v. Taylor
Citations
- 808 P.2d 314
- 167 Ariz. 429
- 73 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23
- 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 355
- 1990 WL 171502
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statutory definition of prostitution did not abridge freedom of theatrical expression
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fidel, Gerber, Montiel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-11-27· cited 17×
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-02-06· cited 10×
- Wooten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-10-30· cited 10×
- State v. FreitagCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-02· cited 6×
- Empress Adult Video v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-11-27
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
- Bechtel Construction, Inc. v. Laborers District CouncilSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 56×
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 42×
- State v. SteigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-09-21· cited 38×
- State of Arizona v. GreenArizona Supreme Court· 1942-11-30· cited 17×
- People v. MaitaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-06-19· cited 16×
- People v. KovnerNew York Supreme Court· 1978-09-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.