People v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that legitimate interests include “preventing venereal disease, cutting down prostitution-related crimes of violence and theft, and protecting the integrity and stability of family life”
• holding that prostitution statute does not affect any fundamental right
• noting Lawrence specifically excludes prostitution from its holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Downin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-04-29· cited 53×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-01-31· cited 23×
• State v. Freitag
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-02· cited 6×
• People v. Conroy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-11-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lawrence v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
• Tully v. Edgar
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-03-21· cited 115×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-10· cited 24×
• Wausau Insurance v. All Chicagoland Moving & Storage Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-27· cited 23×
• People v. Thompson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-06-18· cited 7×