State v. Frederick
Citations
- 989 N.W.2d 504
- 2023 ND 77
Syllabus
In the instance of an alleged public trial violation, an appellant must demonstrate the public was excluded from a proceeding taking place during trial, and that the proceeding was substantive in nature. A district court closing a proceeding to the public is significantly different from the court failing to make an adequate record of a bench conference conducted in an open trial. An inadequate record is not equivalent to a closed trial. To demonstrate that an inadequate record affects a defendant's substantial rights, the defendant must demonstrate the record cannot be adequately supplemented or reconstructed. A violation of Appendix 1, Standard 7(d), N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 9 is not per se reversible error.
Judges: Jensen, Jon J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KollieNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-08-17· cited 8×
- State v. HaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-12-01· cited 8×
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-04-26· cited 7×
- State v. CoonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-06-21· cited 1×
- State v. BarrettNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-11-05
- Smith v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-11-05
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoSixth Circuit· 1985-05-29· cited 326×
- United States v. Henry SelvaFifth Circuit· 1977-09-28· cited 167×
- United States v. James Ted Norris, M.D.Fifth Circuit· 1986-01-17· cited 85×
- State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-07-30· cited 71×
- State v. ErickstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-12-07· cited 66×
- United States v. Thomas Elbert CashwellEleventh Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 57×
- Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-01-11· cited 46×
- United States v. Barry SussmanThird Circuit· 2013-03-06· cited 38×
- State v. EntziNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-07-24· cited 35×
- United States v. Socrates Sierra, United States of America v. Emad Daniel Makhoul, A/K/A CarlosThird Circuit· 1992-12-08· cited 32×
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-04-19· cited 32×
- State v. RaywaltNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-02-10· cited 32×
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-03-09· cited 32×
- State v. PembertonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 30×
- State v. SchlittenhardtNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1966-12-19· cited 29×
- State v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-10-28· cited 28×
- State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-11-06· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-02-26· cited 19×
- State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-03-24· cited 17×
- Cameron, VanessaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-10-08· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.