Skip to main content

State v. Frederick

Citations

  • 989 N.W.2d 504
  • 2023 ND 77

Syllabus

In the instance of an alleged public trial violation, an appellant must demonstrate the public was excluded from a proceeding taking place during trial, and that the proceeding was substantive in nature. A district court closing a proceeding to the public is significantly different from the court failing to make an adequate record of a bench conference conducted in an open trial. An inadequate record is not equivalent to a closed trial. To demonstrate that an inadequate record affects a defendant's substantial rights, the defendant must demonstrate the record cannot be adequately supplemented or reconstructed. A violation of Appendix 1, Standard 7(d), N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 9 is not per se reversible error.

Judges: Jensen, Jon J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.